Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050607205917.E34152@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, David Fetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:49:03PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Robert Bernier wrote: >> >>> There's a lot to be said having two booths at the same convention >>> but on thinking back at Linux world this past February I realised >>> that having more than one kind of group working the booth was one >>> of the factors that made it work, For that matter, last year's >>> OSCON had guys from all over the place which I think really added >>> to it's success too. >> >> One thing that works against this, though, is crowding ... by having >> two booths, one would hope that things wouldn't *look* crowded ... I >> tend to avoid the crowded booths at a show, and come back later when >> there are hopefully less ppl, so that I can talk to someone, instead >> of listening to someone else talk ... > > Although I have a similar feeling about crowded booths, I think that > from an advocacy point of view, it's better to have crowds than > one-at-a-time religious conversions, however profound those might feel. If one could ensure "3 per booth" at all times, then that probably wouldn't be a big issue, but Josh does bring up a strong point about how hard it will potentially be to get 3 for one booth, let alone 3 for two ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: