Re: 2 articles
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 2 articles |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200506070913.41839.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 2 articles (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 2 articles
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert, Chris, > I think the article was accurate (well on this point anyway)... most > developers were, and still are, unaware of EnterpriseDB's interaction with > the community, so it seems pretty natural to me you wouldn't have > remembered much about them. Pretty much. It's normal for a pre-launch company to contact a couple of key Core members but insist on secrecy until they're public. In the US, it's the law (SOX). The only companies who have launched PostgreSQL-related offerings in the last 3 years which have been a surprise were Metapa and Netezza (and both companies have friendly relationships with us now, alougth only Metapa/GreenPlum has contributed to date). Obviously, though, I should have followed up here with commentary about EnterpriseDB after they launched. Sorry, I've been pulled in a lot of different directions lately. I did contact Lisa Vaas and fill her in. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: