Re: using strxfrm for having multi locale/please vote for

I think we have concluded that the use of the ICU library is the way we
are going to accomplish multi-locale support in the future.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mahmoud Taghizadeh wrote:
> there was a discussion in postgresql mailing list about using strxfrm function to add support multi locale.
> most of developers agree that this method is a correct but not perfect solution for having multiple locale in
postgresqland some people suggest to add such functions in contribution. 
>
> the main problem of such functions is the overhead of setlocale. (that can be ommited when you run postgresql in a OS
withadvanced GLIBC and strxfrm_l function) 
>
> I summerized discussion and add one implementation of such functions, I try to convince tom lane to add this function
tothe contribution but I failed. 
>
> maybe you are not interested to this subject but I kindly ask you to say your idea in list.
> please tell clearly that you are agree/disagree for add this function in contribution or not.
>
>
> I am thankful in advance.
>
>
>
>
> With Regards,
> --taghi
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
>  Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

Content-Description: nls_sort.tgz

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073