Re: return_next for plperl (was Re: call for help)

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> This has broken the regression tests for plperl - see for example
>
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=panda&dt=2005-06-04%2021:20:01
> That's because, as Abhijit noted in point 4 below, select foo_srf() no
> longer works.
>
> At a minimum those calls need to be removed from the regression tests.
>
> See also my later comments in response to Neil's request of a few days ago.
> In particular, I would very much like the callback function renamed to a
> simple "return_next".

OK, would you please submit a patch to fix it. Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073