Re: Network Storage Devices / NFS ...
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Network Storage Devices / NFS ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050603004351.B933@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Network Storage Devices / NFS ... ("Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Network Storage Devices / NFS ...
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 10:19:38PM -0300 I heard the voice of > Marc G. Fournier, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> Anyone actually dealing with a configuration using this for your >> data drives? I'm looking for more details on what exactly they are >> using for the NFS server, but I have a client reporting that their >> pg_xlog directory is *full* of .nfs* files that are 'months old' ... >> I'm suspecting that this is some sort of temp file that the NFS >> itself is creating, and is safe to just delete, but am wondering if >> someone out there knows more definitively ... ? > > As I recall, that's a side-effect of deleting files on NFS, because of > the statelessness. If one client has a file open, and another client > deletes it, or two processes on the same client have it open and > deleted respectively, or something on the server... I can't remember > which case it is. But they're renames of files that were "deleted". > If nothing has them open (fstat or lsof or something) they should be > safe to delete (but don't blame me if it blows up!). This is what I was thinking two (around safeness to delete) ... to be absolutely certain, doing a quick maintenance shutdown for the postmaster, remove all .nfs* files and then restarting should be safe too ... Sound about right? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: