Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050603000532.GA11620@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:36:29AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On a particular system, loading 1 million rows (100 bytes, nothing > fancy) into PostgreSQL one transaction at a time takes about 90 > minutes. Doing the same in MySQL/InnoDB takes about 3 minutes. > InnoDB is supposed to have a similar level of functionality as far > as the storage manager is concerned, so I'm puzzled about how this > can be. Does anyone know whether InnoDB is taking some kind of > questionable shortcuts it doesn't tell me about? The client > interface is DBI. This particular test is supposed to simulate a > lot of transactions happening in a short time, so turning off > autocommit is not relevant. This doesn't sound like a very good test. Have they tried the OSDL stuff and/or Jan Wieck's PHP-TPCW? http://www.osdl.org/lab_activities/kernel_testing/osdl_database_test_suite/ http://pgfoundry.org/projects/tpc-w-php/ > As you might imagine, it's hard to argue when the customer sees > these kinds of numbers. So I'd take any FUD I can send back at > them. :) HTH :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: