Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200506012156.j51Lu7h01730@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? ("Alon Goldshuv" <agoldshuv@greenplum.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alon Goldshuv wrote: > 9) allow for Simon's WAL bypass. > > I have surely missed some problems that hide behind the idea, but these > points make me believe that LOAD DATA is a good idea. The community is unlikely to add a new LOAD DATA command that does _almost_ everything COPY does. We are much more likely to incrementally improve COPY. The problem with a new command is that it becomes unclear when you should use COPY and when LOAD DATA, and it confuses users, and has maintenance overhead. If Bizgres wants a new command name, go for it, but it is unlikely that the community release is going to go in that direction, unless there is a fundamental agreement that COPY is broken and needs a major revamp, and I have heard no talk of that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: