Re: Select performance vs. mssql
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Select performance vs. mssql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200505241635.14558.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Select performance vs. mssql (mark durrant <markd89@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Re: Select performance vs. mssql |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Folks, > > This gets brought up a lot. The problem is that the > > index doesn't include > > information about whether the current transaction > > can see the referenced > > row. Putting this information in the index will add > > significant overhead > > to every update and the opinion of the developers is > > that this would be > > a net loss overall. Pretty much. There has been discussion about allowing index-only access to "frozen" tables, i.e. archive partitions. But it all sort of hinges on someone implementing it and testing .... -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: