Re: inet increment w/ int8
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: inet increment w/ int8 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200505231555.j4NFt1o09103@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: inet increment w/ int8 (Douglas McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: inet increment w/ int8
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Douglas McNaught wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > I modified the TODO. I think we only need an INT4. I realize INT8 > > would be for IPV6 but I can't imagine a network that has more than INT4 > > hosts (not part of the network address). > > Actually "increment the host address" isn't a well-defined concept for > IPV6. The "host" part of the address (if you're on an Ethernet) is > generally the 64 bit MAC address. So if the network card dies the machine has a new IPv6 address and you just update your DNS? Do you update your routing tables? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: