Re: patches for items from TODO list

Folks,

> - The COPY -> XML transformation is trivial -- it would be easy for
> clients to roll their own. At the same time, there is no standard or
> canonical XML representation for COPY output, and I can easily imagine
> different clients needing different representations. So there is limited
> value in providing a single, inflexible backend implementation.

I'm going to second Neil here.   This feature becomes useful *only* when there 
is a certified or de-facto universal standard XML representation for database 
data.   Then I could see a case for it.  But there isn't.   

Feel free to throw it on pgFoundry, though.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco