Re: Partitioning / Clustering
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning / Clustering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200505111013.52067.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partitioning / Clustering ("David Roussel" <pgsql-performance@diroussel.xsmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Re: Partitioning / Clustering |
Список | pgsql-performance |
David, > It's interesting that the solution livejournal have arrived at is quite > similar in ways to the way google is set up. Yes, although again, they're using memcached as pseudo-clustering software, and as a result are limited to what fits in RAM (RAM on 27 machines, but it's still RAM). And due to limitations on memcached, the whole thing blows whenever a server goes out (the memcached project is working on this). But any LJ user could tell you that it's a low-availability system. However, memcached (and for us, pg_memcached) is an excellent way to improve horizontal scalability by taking disposable data (like session information) out of the database and putting it in protected RAM. On some websites, adding memcached can result is as much as a 60% decrease in database traffic. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: