Re: LEFT JOIN used in psql describe.c
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LEFT JOIN used in psql describe.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050510201339.T6493@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LEFT JOIN used in psql describe.c (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: LEFT JOIN used in psql describe.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> writes: >>>>> Does anyone know why so many LEFT JOINs are used in psql/describe.c to >>>>> join to the pg_namespace table, like here: >>> >>>> Yes, pg_relnamespace is definitely not null. I've actually already removed >>>> the left joins from my \df patch, since I had to rewrite some of the >>>> queries anyway. If this is wrong, please let me know of course! >>> >>> I think the idea was to be certain to show every pg_proc entry (or other >>> catalog for other \d commands), no matter how badly broken the catalog >>> interrelationships might be. If there's not an unarguable reason >>> for eliminating the left joins I'd be inclined to keep it like that. >>> What does an inner join buy here, other than brittleness? >>> >>> (Yeah, I have the perspective of a developer who deals with broken >>> situations every day. So?) >> >> If we have problems with the system catalogs, I don't see how this join >> has a high probability of catching the problem. If there was some known >> problem of the join not always working, I could see the use of LEFT >> JOIN, but there isn't, so it just seems confusing, and these queries are >> used by others as models of how to do system joins, so could confuse our >> users as well. >> >> I think the LEFT JOIN should be removed unless there is a known problem, >> and if one shows up, we can re-add them later. > > I still think that the LEFT JOINs used in psql system queries is > confusing and perhaps adds performance overhead while adding little > reliability, but no one else seems to think so so I will drop the idea. I'm a bit confused here, but I believe Tom (at least how I read it) was agreeing with you about pulling the LEFT JOIN out ... "I think the LEFT JOIN should be removed unless there is a known problem, and if one shows up, we can re-add them later." ... or am I mis-quoting? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: