Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres

Josh Berkus wrote:
> B-
> 
> > Just saying "we need Oracle packages" doesn't make it happen. ?I have
> > followed the discussion and I still don't have a clear idea of the exact
> > additions that people want, and without that, nothing is likely to
> > happen. ?I don't even have something for the TODO list at this point.
> 
> That's what I'm trying to help define.
> 
> I think that private variables and private functions need to be part of the 
> definition.

OK, so it seems we need:
C static/private functions for schemasC static/private variables for schemas

Are private variables implemented via the temporary per-session schema?
nested schemas

What does the standard say?

Is that it?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073