Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200505091243.01400.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > This is exactly the sort of argumentation that got the last proposal > shot down ;-). I see no reason that you can't do the namespacing and > security as well or better using the existing (and more standard) schema > feature. If there's something there that's not covered, what is it? a) When you have 1000's of procedures, it becomes very useful to have more than one level of namespacing. This is not an exaggeration; one project I looked at who decided not to convert from Oracle to PostgreSQL had over 100,000 procedures and functions. Lack of packages was their main reason for not switching. Schemas provide only *one* level of namespacing, unless we want to "improve" on the SQL standard and allow nested schemas. b) Schemas do not provide us with any way of limiting the scope of functions and persistent variables. With packages, you would want:1. functions which can only be called internally to the package2.variables which are only visible inside the package3. functions which can only be called as part of the package(thus utilizing the initialization and internal variables) and not on their own. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: