Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
От | Russell Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200505041748.48213.mr-russ@pws.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement (Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 May 2005 04:40 am, Tom Copeland wrote: > On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:26 -0400, Mitch Pirtle wrote: > > If you guys are planning on running Gforge, then you better make 'box' plural. > > > > I'm running MamboForge.net, and the poor thing is getting beat into > > the cold hard earth every day. We (Mambo) should really have two > > servers, at least to dedicate hardware to the database. Most of the > > servers in that class are dual Xeons as well - just as an indicator of > > what you are getting yourselves into ;-) > > Of course, Mitch is running the second largest GForge site on the planet > (as far as I know).... second only to https://helixcommunity.org/. > Here's a list of them: > > http://gforge.org/docman/view.php/1/52/gforge-sites.html > Where does all the CPU/disk time go? Do we have any idea what are the strained parts of the system? Is it the database? Regards Russell Smith. > Yours, > > Tom Copeland > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: