Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050504114704.Y53065@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> >>> As for CVS - if we can't do development the way we want using it then it's >>> time to replace it. >>> >> >> CVS's capabilities (or lack of same) are completely unrelated to the >> matter in hand. What we are talking about is packaging, ie what should >> sensibly go out in the same shipped tarball. >> >> > I agree. I was responding to Josh's suggestion that CVS limitations were > driving policy, but your response is more apposite ;-) Just curious here ... but do any of the version control systems provide "per directory user restrictions"? Where I could give CVS access to Joshua, for instance, just to the plphp directory? Serious question here, since I don't know, I only know CVS can't (or, rather, not that I've ever been able to find in the docs) ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: