Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050504113715.V53065@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Christopher Browne wrote: > A fairer comparison would be the BSD core systems. I believe that most > of them have a considerably larger set of stuff in the "central CVS"... Yup, and *everyone* with commit accesss has access to *everything* ... I could intruduce a 1 bit change to one of the kernel sources and there is a chance that nobody would ever notice it ... and this includes (or, at least, the last time I did any work) port committers ... And, as Josh pointed out, one of the goals with pgfoundry was/is to make it easy for 'Project Admin' to add commit access to whomever they wish, whenever they wish, something that doesn't happen with FreeBSD ... its relatively rare that you see a new committer added, and not on a whim ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: