Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050429225626.X53065@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Christopher Browne wrote: > Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when scrappy@postgresql.org ("Marc G. Fournier") wrote: >> I know one person was talking about being able to target only those >> that pages that have changes, instead of the whole table ... but some >> sort of "load monitoring" that checks # of active connections and >> tries to find 'lulls'? > > I have some "log table purging" processes I'd like to put in place; it > would be really slick to be able to get some statistics from the > system as to how busy the DB has been in the last little while. > > The nice, adaptive algorithm: > > - Loop forever > > - Once a minute, evaluate how busy things seem, giving some metric X > > -> If X is "high" then purge 10 elderly tuples from table log_table > -> If X is "moderate" then purge 100 elderly tuples from table > log_table > -> If X is "low" then purge 1000 elderly tuples from table > log_table > > The trouble is in measuring some form of "X." > > Some reasonable approximations might include: > - How much disk I/O was recorded in the last 60 seconds? > - How many application transactions (e.g. - invoices or such) were > issued in the last 60 seconds (monitoring a sequence could be > good enough). Some way of doing a 'partial vacuum' would be nice ... where a VACUUM could stop after it processed those '10 elderly tuples' and on the next pass, resume from that point instead of starting from the beginning again ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: