Re: ip connection on local p2p network
От | Shelby Cain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ip connection on local p2p network |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050429183133.18106.qmail@web50105.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ip connection on local p2p network (typing80wpm@aol.com) |
Список | pgsql-general |
--- typing80wpm@aol.com wrote: > I just installed the windows postgresql on one of > the five machines in our office, which happens to be > 192.0.0.9 according to ipconfig. I have installed > pg explorer on another machine which happens to be > 192.0.0.101 .... What changes do I have to make > in the various .conf files for the postgresql > server, (and in pg explorer) so that I can connect > to the server from the other workstation, hence > proving to myself that I could use postgres on our > small office network. Thanks for your help! > Shouldn't you be using 192.168.x.x addresses internally? I don't believe 192.0.x.x is a valid range for the non-routable non-public ip ranges. Assuming a single NIC in the server machine, change listen_addresses to "*" in postgresql.conf to listen on all interfaces. You may want to tailor the specific addresses to listen on instead if you have more than one network. You'll need to add a line to pg_hba.conf. As an example, assuming you have 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 you'd add a line like "host all all 192.168.0.0/8 md5". That would enable non-ssl connections for all users/databases and use md5 challenge/response for password authentication over the wire. Regards, Shelby Cain __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: