Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050429124149.W53065@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:09:43 -0400, > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes: >>>> In the last exciting episode, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) wrote: >>>>> o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce) >>> >>>> If this can kick off a vacuum of a Very Large Table at an unfortunate >>>> time, this can turn out to be a prety painful misfeature. >>> >>> [ shrug... ] You'll always be able to turn it off if you don't want it. >>> I'm not sure that we'll be ready to turn it on by default even in 8.1. >> >> Agreed. It will just be there to turn on from postgresql.conf if you >> want it, and we do have TODO information about keeping such an FSM for >> recently expired pages. > > I think if we aren't finding problems in testing that it would be better > to turn pg_autovacuum on by default. Vacuum is something the burns new > users and having it one by default is going to cut down on surprises. Except for the surprise of peridically having the system go unresponsive because it hit a large table, and that new user wondering what is wrong with postgresql that it just stalls seemingly randomly :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: