Re: BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See example.
| От | Ariel Carna |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See example. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050427150126.B2BAE18F42@fox.tarifar.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See example. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
With Oracle (at least since 6.x version) this conversion is wrong.
Atentamente ,=20
Ariel Carn=E1
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]=20
Enviado el: Mi=E9rcoles, 27 de Abril de 2005 11:54 a.m.
Para: Michael Fuhr
CC: Ariel E. Carn=C3=A1/Elizabeth Sosa; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Asunto: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See
example.=20
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> If anything I'd expect 2005-02-32 to be rejected as invalid, but I
> don't know the history or rationale behind to_date's behavior.
It is rejected by the standard date input converter:
regression=3D# select '2005-02-32'::date;
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "2005-02-32"
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
However we consider that to_date() exists to be Oracle compatible,
and so I would regard this as a bug if and only if Oracle does
something different with the same input. Anyone know?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: