Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200504221242.02774.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > I've never fully understood the distinction the stats make between > "tuples fetched" and "tuples returned", and it's even less obvious how > to apply it when the index and heap operations are decoupled. Well, it's mainly a counter to measure how many dead rows are in your active data set. It probably belongs elsewhere, such as pg_stats_all_tables with the overall fetch counts. > In > particular the function design assumes that heap tuple fetches can be > tied to particular indexes, which is now a broken assumption. You > might be amused by this test case I just finished debugging: Well, I'd be in favor of moving the "useful" version of tuples_returned to pg_stat_*_tables as an overall count. However, we cant drop the column from pg_stat_indexes without breaking apps; at best, we'd have to warn people of the accuracy issues and give it a few versions before we dropped it. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: