Re: Index bloat problem?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index bloat problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200504211042.38633.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index bloat problem? (Bill Chandler <billybobc1210@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Bill, > Honestly, this seems like an inordinate amount of > babysitting for a production application. I'm not > sure if the client will be willing to accept it. Well, then, tell them not to delete 75% of the rows in a table at once. I imagine that operation brought processing to a halt, too. > Admittedly my knowledge of the inner workings of an > RDBMS is limited, but could somebody explain to me why > this would be so? If you delete a bunch of rows why > doesn't the index get updated at the same time? It does get updated. What doesn't happen is the space getting reclaimed. In a *normal* data situation, those dead nodes would be replaced with new index nodes. However, a mass-delete-in-one-go messes that system up. > Is > this a common issue among all RDBMSs or is it > something that is PostgreSQL specific? Speaking from experience, this sort of thing affects MSSQL as well, although the maintenance routines are different. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: