Re: SETOF function call
От | Philip Yarra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SETOF function call |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200504191216.07640.philip@utiba.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SETOF function call (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SETOF function call
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
sizeof(Datum) == sizeof(long) - is that compatible with %d formatting (I'm guessing something like vsprintf takes place in elog)? Wouldn't this need %ld or %lu? Sorry if this misses the point, I wasn't clear from original post if the segfault was on elog or after it. Regards, Philip. On Tuesday 19 April 2005 11:53, Tom Lane wrote: > Olivier Thauvin <olivier.thauvin@aerov.jussieu.fr> writes: > > Datum > > header_querytxt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > > { > > elog(NOTICE, "querytxt"); > > Datum tag; > > /* converting TEXT value to integer one */ > > tag = DirectFunctionCall1(rpmtagvalue, PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(1)); > > elog(NOTICE, "querytxt %d", tag); > > /* header_query = function accepting integer instead text) > > PG_RETURN_POINTER(DirectFunctionCall2(header_query, > > PG_GETARG_BYTEA_P_COPY(0), tag)); > > } > > If that's a cut-and-paste, then you seem to be short a */ on the second > comment ... > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > > ----------------- > Utiba Pty Ltd > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is > believed to be clean. > > ----------------- Utiba Pty Ltd This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is believed to be clean.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: