Re: [Fwd: Re: Functionscan estimates]
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Fwd: Re: Functionscan estimates] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050414185809.GD28198@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Fwd: Re: Functionscan estimates] (elein@varlena.com (elein)) |
Ответы |
Re: [Fwd: Re: Functionscan estimates]
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:39:03AM -0700, elein wrote: > All functions could have a cost associated with them, set by the writer of > the function in order for the planner to reorder function calls. > The stonebraker airplane level example was: > select ... from ... where f(id) = 3 and expensive_image_function(img) > The idea, of course is to weight the expensive function so it was > pushed to the end of the execution. So there was only a constant cost associated with the function? No estimator function, for example? -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>) "If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: