Re: High traffic websites...
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: High traffic websites... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200503312229.31187.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: High traffic websites... (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thursday 31 March 2005 17:57, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 15:30 -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > > I'm sure that a lot of you saw the article on /. a couple days ago about > > "PostgreSQL on big sites?", where someone asked for a list of high > > traffic websites that are using PostgreSQL on the backend. > > My penny contribution... > > Show me a list of high traffic websites that use only one > server/subdomain for all of the connected pages. All of them I know of > use many subdomains and almost all use many different systems on each, > so its a strange question, designed mostly to attack. All multi-sites > have a range of traffic levels on various applications that make up > their sites. Many of these are RDBMS connected, many are not. Google > sure as hell doesn't use any RDBMS. > Hey I'd be happy with a site the employed several postgresql databases to handle its various subdomains. Even better would be one that used slony to handle extremely high read only traffic... nothing wrong with that. > No wish to start a flamewar, but I am content in the thought that > PostgreSQL can't do the top slice of performance requirements that > exist. How big is that slice? Thats the point for debate, for me. There > isn't any market anywhere with more than 1 player in, where the cheapest > is as good as the most expensive; thats economics. > I think that's an arguable position... look at apache. I'd be willing to say it's the cheapest and is *better* than the most expensive. > You'll never please the people who want to see "Big", "More" etc > references and proof. I am interested in talking to people who want > "Enough", "Sufficient" and "Cost/Effective"; that is sufficient for > me... > I think your wrong on that... people want to know if X brand database can handle high traffic websites... if you can say "we power amazon" or "we power yahoo" then I think that satisfies *a lot* of people. Maybe not all but certainly a good number, so I don't think there is anything wrong with trying to find some shining examples that we can point to. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: