Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I have made this test without any user connect and after vacuum and all
index recteated and tables analyzed.
Well, produt.codpro is SERIAL
And movest.codpro is NUMBER(8)
Thanks
Rodrigo
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Michael Fuhr [mailto:mike@fuhr.org]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 17 de março de 2005 01:42
Para: Rodrigo Moreno
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Assunto: Re: [PERFORM] Help to find out problem with joined tables
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:10:17PM -0300, Rodrigo Moreno wrote:
> If I join movest/natope, it's fast, if I join movest/produt, it's fast
> too, but when I put a third joined table, forget, it's very slow.
What version of PostgreSQL are you using?
> All tables are vacuumed by vacummdb --full --analyze, every night All
> Indexes are reindexed every night
How many updates/deletes do the tables see between vacuums?
> Movest: +- 2 milions rows, indexed
> Natope: 30 rows PK(natope_id)
> Produt: +- 1400 Rows PK(codpro)
Could you show the table definitions, or at least the definitions for the
relevant columns and indexes?
> -> Seq Scan on produt c (cost=0.00..108.26 rows=8 width=4) (actual
> time=2688.356..2875.743 rows=1 loops=6)
> Filter: ((codpro)::numeric = 629001::numeric)
What type is produt.codpro? You might be missing a potential index scan
here due to mismatched types.
The times (2688.356..2875.743) here look odd, although I might be
overlooking or misinterpreting something. I don't know what else might
cause that, but one thing that can is a lot of dead tuples in the table,
hence my question about how much activity the tables see between vacuums.
Maybe somebody else can provide a better explanation.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/