Re: Bumping libpq version number?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Bumping libpq version number?
Дата
Msg-id 200503112149.j2BLnNn27185@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Bumping libpq version number?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Bumping libpq version number?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: Bumping libpq version number?  (Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>)
Список pgsql-hackers
pgman wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Are we still bumping the libpq major version number for 8.0.2?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> > > I 
> > > think it is a bad idea because we will require too many client apps
> > > to be recompiled,
> > 
> > That is not true, as previously discussed.
> 
> It is not true only if the old libpq stays around, which isn't always
> the case.

In fact, based on the few complaints we have heard about the current
situation, I am sure we are going to get many more complaints if we bump
up the major version in 8.0.2.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bumping libpq version number?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] BUG #1466: syslogger issues