Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?
От | Jean-Paul Argudo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050311093134.GA30406@maison.argudo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ? (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> There _is_ a problem with doing so, organisationally, as that does > make the organisation more or less political in nature. And that > can disqualify it from being treated as a charitable organisation. Placing a projet as Open Source, IMHO, is already a political act. It means you care about people, and sharing knowledge, etc: let's say is more or less LEFT side politic.... It may means too you care about free commercial relashionships, free open market, etc: let's say is more or less RIGHT side politic... IMHO, everything is political when you are involved in any organization of any nature. How PostgreSQL can tell on the main website " The world's most advanced open source database " ... *and* not defending Open source from its major threat: patents? This seems schyzophrenic to me. Regards, -- Jean-Paul ARGUDO www.PostgreSQLFr.org OpenPGP : 1024D/93A41CA4
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: