Re: Licensing
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Licensing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050305163853.GA636@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Licensing (Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@startnet.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Licensing
Re: Licensing |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:48:24 +0100, Miroslav ?ulc <miroslav.sulc@startnet.cz> wrote: > If I understood MySQL licensing correctly, simply said, end user has two > choices: > > 1) when using application that is licensed under GPL, he/she can use > MySQL for free > 2) when using application under any other license (simplified), he/she > must pay for each MySQL installation No really. The software is GPL and you can use it as you would any GPL software. However MySQL threatans to take people to court if they use the software commercially. They may or may not win, but this gets companies to pay MySQL license fees rather than pay to go to court. In theory if your application isn't tied tightly to MySQL you should be able to win a lawsuit. But the first couple of companies that did this will probably end up paying more in court costs than license fees. I don't think their licensing stance is ethical. Because they own the full copyright and effectively own the developers, they could play other games down the road as well.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: