Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: idea for concurrent seqscans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050226000353.GQ84483@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: idea for concurrent seqscans (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:30:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org> writes: > > I didn't consider that. Is there a reason the regression tests assume > > the results will be returned in a certain order (or a consistent order)? > > We use diff as the checking tool. Doesn't the SQL spec specifically state that the only time you'll get results in a deterministic order is if you use ORDER BY? Assuming otherwise seems a bad idea (though at least in the case of testing it makes the test more strenuous rather than less...) -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: