Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200502190415.j1J4Fbm15588@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Still to be determined: what we lose in extra I/O from the presumably > less efficient cache management; also what sort of slowdown occurs on > a single-CPU machine that isn't going to get any benefit from the > increased amount of lock management. But it looks promising. Yea, that was one of my questions --- the new buffer locking helps SMP, but how much does it hurt single-cpu machines? Do we need autodetection or a GUC to control SMP-beneficial locking? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: