Re: UTF8 or Unicode
От | Abhijit Menon-Sen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UTF8 or Unicode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050215022732.GB24807@penne.toroid.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | UTF8 or Unicode (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: UTF8 or Unicode
Re: UTF8 or Unicode |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 2005-02-14 21:14:54 -0500, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us wrote: > > Should our multi-byte encoding be referred to as UTF8 or Unicode? The *encoding* should certainly be referred to as UTF-8. Unicode is a character set, not an encoding; Unicode characters may be encoded with UTF-8, among other things. (One might think of a charset as being a set of integers representing characters, and an encoding as specifying how those integers may be converted to bytes.) > I know UTF8 is a type of unicode but do we need to rename anything > from Unicode to UTF8? I don't know. I'll go through the documentation to see if I can find anything that needs changing. -- ams
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: