Re: Function return number of affected rows
От | Michael Fuhr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Function return number of affected rows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050210221505.GA73565@winnie.fuhr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Function return number of affected rows ("Francisco Figueiredo Jr." <fxjrlists@yahoo.com.br>) |
Ответы |
Re: Function return number of affected rows
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:51:46PM -0200, Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote: > Michael Fuhr wrote: > >Does Npgsql use its own implemention of the PostgreSQL protocol? > >If so, then that implementation will have to provide the desired > >functionality itself. > > Yeap. Npgsql implements protocol itself. This is exactly the problem. > I'm not receiving the CompletedResponse protocol message when executing > the insert inside a function. It is through the CompletedResponse > postgresql server says how many rows were affected. But it seems that > when calling a function it doesn't return any. I haven't used Npgsql, but the documentation has an example with the following code: NpgsqlCommand command = new NpgsqlCommand("insert into table1 values(1, 1)", conn); Int32 rowsaffected; try { rowsaffected= command.ExecuteNonQuery(); } Is that what you're trying to do? Does it not work? I downloaded the latest Npgsql source and found the following in ExecuteNonQuery(): // The number of rows affected is in the third token for insert queries // and in the second token for update and deletequeries. // In other words, it is the last token in the 0-based array. return Int32.Parse(ret_string_tokens[ret_string_tokens.Length - 1]); It looks like ExecuteNonQuery() is at least attempting to return the number of rows affected. Have I misunderstood what you're doing? -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: