Re: Thinking about breaking up the BufMgrLock
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Thinking about breaking up the BufMgrLock |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050207052652.GG47995@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Thinking about breaking up the BufMgrLock (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:53:38PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > This is a well understood problem. I remember it from my Systems class in > school. And searching on google finds lecture notes that match my memory that > there are other systems generally preferred to LRU precisely because they > don't require extensive list management in the critical path. > > For example these slides: > > http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/lorenzo/corsi/cs372/03F/notes/11-20.pdf It might be worth taking a gander at the appropriate sections of either The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating System (http://lnk.nu/amazon.com/1ds) or the 4.3 version (http://lnk.nu/amazon.com/1dt). I've read the 4.3 one, and there's a lot of discussion of the buffer management algorithms chosen, and why they were chosen. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: