Re: IBM patent
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IBM patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050129183128.K63001@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: IBM patent (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: IBM patent
Re: IBM patent |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Christopher Browne wrote: > Actually, the latter isn't so. > > If Mammoth or Pervasive or such release their own release of > PostgreSQL, nothing has historically mandated that they make that > release available under the BSD license. > > Presumably acceptance of the patent would change that. > > You and I might not have individual objections to this situation, but > one or another of the companies putting together PostgreSQL releases > very well might. But, there is nothing stop'ng them from replacing the ARC code with their own variant though ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: