Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050119161638.GA5725@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) ("Mark Cave-Ayland" <m.cave-ayland@webbased.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 14:59:17 -0000, Mark Cave-Ayland <m.cave-ayland@webbased.co.uk> wrote: > BEGIN; > INSERT INTO person (first_name, .... Tel) VALUES ('Fred', .... > '12345'); > INSERT INTO person_count(id) VALUES (currval('id_seq')); > COMMIT; > > > So then I would use SELECT COUNT(*) FROM person_count whenever I wanted to > know the current number of person records. How much quicker would a COUNT(*) > be if visibility were included in the indices as opposed to a "hacked" > approach like this? You are only going to get a constant factor speed up unless the space savings allows much better use of cache. You probably want to look at using triggers to maintain counts in another table.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: