Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ...
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050118154943.GA15110@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ... (Nicolai Tufar <ntufar@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:22:58AM +0200, Nicolai Tufar wrote: > Greetings, > > Patents do not transcend international border. They need > to be applied for in each country separately. > > To ease the process of applying for patents in many countries > at once Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) was formed. When you It's also true that many countried have bilateral treatings respecting the "intellectual property" in the other country. Canada has such with the US, as far as I know, so that it is possible to request injunctive relief in Canada for violation of a patent which is grated by the USPTO. The relief is limited, however, and requires certain hoop-jumping which is sort of tiresome. Unless, of course, you have a large, full time legal staff and you're already a multinational. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The plural of anecdote is not data. --Roger Brinner
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: