Re: ARC patent
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050117192744.GB12666@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ARC patent (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ARC patent
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 03:14:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I don't think it needs to delay the release; the patent is only pending. > But we need to look into the problem. What will you do if the patent is granted, 8.0 is out there with the offending code, and you get a cease-and-desist letter from IBM demanding the removal of all offending code from the Net? The code would have to be yanked from CVS &c., in that case, no? (IANAL, but I think I may consult with one.) A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. --Philip Greenspun
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: