Re: FAQ.html corrections

On Monday 17 January 2005 00:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Bruce,
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Changed.  I think we have to use US spelling for consistency. I think
> > > > our docs made that adjustment too.
> >
> > Since when?  We've been agnostic about US/British spellings for years.
> > For example, our license is as licence.html.
>
> Oh, I thought we had made changes for consistency in the docs.  Maybe
> someone just suggested it in the past.  I have not feeling one way or
> the other myself.  If we could mix non-English in to the docs that would
> be cool too.
>
> I will say I can't spell most words that are different in US and UK
> anymore because I can't remember which is which anymore.  License is one
> of the confusing ones.

I just got tripped up by vacuum/explain analyze and analyse. Everwhere in the
docs we refer to it as analyze, but both work and analyse is a reserved word.
Was thinking maybe the analyze page should be updated if we don't have any
intention to move toward one or the other.  Incidentally, while my opinion
may be a little coloured ;-) I do think the Z spelling is more correct, since
afaik everyone says it with z phonetics.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL