Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200501140936.08654.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Merlin, > I think the danger about SATA is that many SATA components are not > server quality, so you have to be more careful about what you buy. For > example, you can't just assume your SATA backplane has hot swap lights > (got bit by this one myself, heh). Yeah, that's my big problem with anything IDE. My personal experience of failure rates for IDE drives, for example, is about 1 out of 10 fails in service before it's a year old; SCSI has been more like 1 out of 50. Also, while I've seen benchmarks like Escalade's, my real-world experience has been that the full bi-directional r/w of SCSI means that it takes 2 SATA drives to equal one SCSI drive in a heavy r/w application. However, ODSL is all SCSI so I don't have any numbers to back that up. But one of my clients needs a new docs server, so maybe I can give an Escalade a spin. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: