Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)
От | Michael Fuhr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050113224233.GA61555@winnie.fuhr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)
Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster) Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 05:05:00PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Pavel Stehule <stehule@kix.fsv.cvut.cz> writes: > >> And? > >> > >> (ie, what test case are you talking about?) > > > This test is function for searching max factor. It is speaking only about > > quality of interpret an language. I would ask why? > > So I can replicate your test. SELECT delitel(1000000, 1); Mean times over the last five of six runs on my poor 500MHz FreeBSD 4.11-PRERELEASE box: 6741 ms 7.4.6 (from FreeBSD ports collection) 14427 ms 8.0.0rc5 (from CVS source) I remembered that I had build 8.0.0rc5 with --enable-debug so I rebuilt it without that option, not sure if that would make a difference. The mean time increased by 8% to 15580 ms, which was opposite from what I expected. I re-ran the 7.4.6 tests and they came out the same as they had before. I'm not sure what optimization flags (if any) the ports build of 7.4.6 might have used. I can take a closer look if you think it matters. -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: