Re: Large Objects
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large Objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041231062140.GC17555@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Large Objects (Dan Boitnott <dan@mcneese.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Large Objects
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 10:39:48 -0600, Dan Boitnott <dan@mcneese.edu> wrote: > I need to do some investigation into the way Postgres handles large > objects for a major project involving large objects. My questions are: I don't know the answer to all of your questions. > * Is it practical/desirable to store files MIME-Encoded inside a > text field? This should be possible if the files aren't too large. bytea is another type that might be better to use. > * The obvious disadvantages: > * slow, Slow, SLOW If you always need to access the whole file this might not be too bad. But if you only need to access a small part, you are going to pay a big cost as the whole record will need to be retrieved before you can pick out the part you want. > * significant increase in per-file storage requirements It might not be too bad as large records can be compressed. That should get back some of the bloat from uuencoding.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: