Re: pg_class changes for group ownership
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_class changes for group ownership |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041229184156.GD10437@ns.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_class changes for group ownership (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_class changes for group ownership
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > Ah, alright, sounds good to me. I'll look into making them share a > > common unique identifier space, that shouldn't be too difficult. Of > > course, that'll require a dump/restore, I expect.. I don't suppose that > > could possibly happen before 8.0, eh? :) > > Changing pg_class would have the same problem ... Well, yes, but that's no longer the issue. I guess my thought was that if we could get the common id space change in before 8.0 then group ownership could possibly be introduced in 8.1 w/o having to do a dump/restore. I'm still relatively new to Postgres, is it normal to require a dump/restore between semi-major (8.0 to 8.1) revisions? If so then it doesn't matter since I wouldn't expect group ownership to be introduced prior to 8.1 (at the earliest..) anyway. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: