Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200412281627.iBSGR3v02251@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > What if we malloc 100k just before we create the postmaster segment and > > then free it and see if that fixes the postgres.exe problem? > > That was suggested already. As a permanent fix it's certainly > unspeakably ugly, but it would be useful to try it just to prove > (or disprove) that we understand the problem. > > It would probably be a good idea to make the padding at least 256K, > since the numbers that have been tossed around seem to indicate that > Windows may be aligning things on 128K boundaries. > > My inclination for a permanent fix would be to try to do the shmat() > much earlier, but I don't think we should go to the effort of doing > that code rearrangement until we've proven that this is indeed the > issue. Right. Merlin, I added you to this email. Can you test that? Do you need us to send you a patch for testing? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: