Re: Fwd: 8.0 vs. 7.4 benchmarks
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fwd: 8.0 vs. 7.4 benchmarks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041207174355.GA12296@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fwd: 8.0 vs. 7.4 benchmarks (Postgres Learner <postgres.learner@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fwd: 8.0 vs. 7.4 benchmarks
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:43:03 -0800, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > IMHO 8.0 means, hey all you external developers -- time to test > with your applications and report bugs. > > 8.1 means, alright we got some wide reports -- fixed a few mistakes > and now were ready. That should probably be 8.0.1. That is what the next release will be named. Typically there is a *.*.1 release not too long after the *.* release. My memory is that this has been around 2-3 months for the last serveral *.* releases. 8.1 will be an important release as it should include integrated autovacuum, some tools for handling PITR recoveries and other changes related to lessons learned from the several major feature additions in 8.0. I will be surprised if 8.1 is released before next fall. We did have a thread about *.* releases about a month ago and the data seemed to suggest that the *.* releases tended to be better than the latest version of the previous *.* release. (I think the main problem is that some fixes were not being back ported because they are too extensive to be safely back ported.) So with 8.0, it might be a good idea to hold off for a little bit to see if anything major was missed during beta, but that it might be desirable to upgrade to 8.0 without waiting for 8.0.1 if there aren't any major problems reported within a few weeks of the release.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: