Re: Doc patch needed: encodings?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Doc patch needed: encodings? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200412062002.43906.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Doc patch needed: encodings? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Doc patch needed: encodings?
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Josh Berkus wrote: > In US distributions it's a recent thing. The switch to non-C > locales is a recent thing; RH Enterprise 3.0, and SuSE 9.0. I have it on record that Red Hat has set a non-C locale by default at least since Red Hat 6.1 as distributed in North America (aren't they the same anyway?) in 1999. I know that because we had this exact discussion back then. > I'd like to have an explanation of this somewhere else newbies are > liable to read it, *before* their first production "LIKE" query > doesn't use an index. Where would be appropriate? Near the documentation of "LIKE". > And, for English speakers, what exactly is wrong with using 'C' > locale instead of the environment one? It makes it difficult to write a résumé, to name one thing. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: