Re: Corporate Contributors WAS: merging advocacy and "overview"
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Corporate Contributors WAS: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200412031018.16024.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Corporate Contributors WAS: merging advocacy and
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Robert, Josh, Elein, etc.: I do think this is important to settle. Right now, it's General Bits which sits square on the border between "contribution" and "external"; Next time it might be someone else. Sucks for Elein that it's your site we're talking about, but it helps us make some rules that we'll need again later. However, I think that we should take this over to -Advocacy. Even though this will mean a more chaotic discussion, it IS what the Advocacy list is for, and if we make decisions here without raising them there, we might as well kill that list. So I'll be laying things out for that list. > An example is Practical PostgreSQL. That book has been > online since the day it hit shelves, free for anyone to use. > But it isn't the same as say donating patches to ECPG or > PlPerl which gets directly injected into the community. > Practical PostgreSQL is a community resource, but it is > not community sponsored. On the other hand, PL/PHP is considered a "contribution" even though it is hosted at CMD's site. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: