Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >This seems workable as long as we document the possible gotchas.
> >
> >
> >
> Is that really worthwhile? There are half a dozend assumption about the
> C library and kernel internal efficiency of the signal handling
> functions in the proposal. Adding a PQinitLib function is obviously a
The main path uses pthread_sigmask() and sigpending(). Are those
possible performance problems? I see how signal() would be a thread
problem, but not those.
> larger change, but it solves the problem.
> I'm aware of one minor gotcha: PQinSend() is not usable right now: it
> relies on the initialization of pq_thread_in_send, which is only created
> in the middle of the first connectDB(). That makes proper signal
> handling for the first connection impossible.
I think that whole PQinSend thing is pretty ugly, even if I did write
it. My current patch seems like a great improvement.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073