Re: Benchmark-Comparison PostGreSQL vs. SQL Server
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Benchmark-Comparison PostGreSQL vs. SQL Server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200411251836.07053.ghodechhap@ghodechhap.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Benchmark-Comparison PostGreSQL vs. SQL Server (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Benchmark-Comparison PostGreSQL vs. SQL Server
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 25 Nov 2004 6:22 pm, Richard Huxton wrote: > > On the other hand, if an application has to "fight" against the file > > system, I would suppose it to increase RAM and CPU usage > > significantly. > > It shouldn't be fighting the file system, but it does use it, and rely > on it for caching (rather than bypassing your filesystem cache). For > MS-SQL server I'm guessing you're allocating a lot of memory to SQL > server and not much to the file-cache. For PG you'll want it the other > way around. Do we have some sort of document about how caching on windows works? It is very simple on linux and BSDs but for other OSs, I haven't seen many suggestions. I am sure OS specific hints would help OP a lot. Shridhar
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: